> On the one hand, women have obviously been disadvantaged in many ways, for many years, which is wrong.
> If this was targeted specifically to disadvantaged people
You already accepted women have been disadvantaged though.
> If this was targeted specifically to disadvantaged people
You already accepted women have been disadvantaged though.
There's nothing in this release saying they want to offer this to disadvantaged women, they simply want to offer it to women.
But you've said they have been disadvantaged as a group, so they are offering it to a disadvantaged group. I think you're saying they should be disadvantaged in a way besides their gender?
From the lens of intersectionality, I could interpret 'disadvantaged women' to mean women who are also part of another marginalized group (e.g. trans women, women of color, women with disabilities, etc.)
But I could also read your comment as just asking them to be explicit and emphasize that they are making an offering for "women, a group of people at a disadvantage".