In Andrew Yang, the Internet Finds a Meme-Worthy Candidate
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
With his campaign's emphasis on automation, this is a pretty clever stunt.
Iowa is a key early caucus state that is known for putting a premium on retail politics and direct interaction with candidates, so that seems like the perfect technique to demonstrate to voters there exactly the stereotypical disregard of out-of-touch coastal elites to flyover states.
1. Trump is a result of economic pain more than racism, help the working class, don’t vilify them.
2. A lot of people are getting left behind, we should find ways of helping them out, not abandoning them (for instance changing the electoral college so costal cities can determine the course of the country alone)
There’s more stuff too but he’s smart, articulate, and direct. Should be interesting to see the debates.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/24/us/politics/trump-economi...
Here's a more detailed breakdown of Trump supporter demographics:
https://www.thoughtco.com/meet-the-people-behind-donald-trum...
This is an already popular idea, and as a sibling comment notes one refuted by all factual investigation.
> help the working class, don’t vilify them.
This is, nevertheless, a correct answer (in large part because it is selling an alternative, well-grounded, highly-resonant status threat narrative which there is reason to expect could displace the other as a primary concern, not because economic concerns actually powered Trump). It's also a popular one already in the Democratic Party being the central idea of the Sanders and Warren campaigns, and an important idea for Harris and several other candidates. But it's not something Yang is particularly needed to, or likely to, make a difference in the overall prominence of.
> 2. A lot of people are getting left behind, we should find ways of helping them out, not abandoning them
This is like almost precisely a restatement of the second half of #1, not a separate point.
> (for instance changing the electoral college so costal cities can determine the course of the country alone)
Eliminating the electoral college wouldn't do that, anyhow, unless you expand “coastal” to mean “near any surface or subsurface body of fresh or salt water”. And the disenfranchised—by the EC and/or partisan gerrymandering—residents of the cities (coastal or not), aside from the narrow wealthy elite, are very much being left behind, not least by policies that fail to account adequately for real poverty.
why the hell should we give control of the entire country to the coastal cities... what kind of insanity is that