NZ declares massacre video “objectionable,” arrests people who shared it
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
I can speak from direct experience that the video is awful and has essentially no redeeming value save for serving as proof that these events occurred. But if our goal is to dissuade people from watching the video I do wonder whether threatening people with prison sentences is the best way to go about it. General sensibilities and removal from major platforms will prevent people who don't want to see it from seeing it. Those that do want to see it will be able to do so regardless of government censorship with a VPN and a torrent client. The ban had moved a lot of people from the former category to the latter.
Not to mention this censorship feeds into extremists' belief that the attack was staged, say, to prompt the government to enact more restrictive gun laws. This was one of the reasons why the Sandy Hook shooting had a lot of conspiracy theories surrounding it.
Almost every month or two, I read this exact story just with different details:
Government/Company doesn't like/approve of X. Government/Company decides to be extremely vocal about not liking X, via media/laws/bills/debates/lawsuits. Everyone wants to see what the fuss is all about, so they download/view/buy/research X. Government/Company gets angry. Rinse. Repeat.