Hacker News Reader

Comment by lexs | Hacker News Reader

In regards to 3. why exactly is not using CC for mailing lists "retarded" (very poor choice of words by the way). Just because I'm on a mailing list doesn't mean everyone in that mailing list should see my mail address and the fact that I'm subscribed. That is exactly what BCC is for so why not use it?

View on HN

Eh? Nobody mentioned mailing lists except you. The guy who brought up GDPR was suggesting that the CC feature in itself might be a GDPR violation. You, on the other hand, are talking about a specific use of CC that people broadly agree is wrong, but presenting that as if it's the same thing as what the first guy said.

This is like somebody calling for a law that bans all cars, someone else calling that retarded, and you coming along and saying Why exactly is it retarded not to drive on the pavements? That's what roads are for!

Well it clearly depends on how you use the CC feature, most of the complains about CC have been in regards to mailing lists as that's where obviously unwanted information leaks happen.

"the CC feature in itself might be a GDPR violation" is a, to use your words, "retarded" idea. For starters you can still send emails internally, perfectly fine to use CC there. Also I'm sure there are some legitimate interest cases where CC instead of BCC makes sense too.

This is classic GDPR fear mongering and laziness.

> "the CC feature in itself might be a GDPR violation" is a, to use your words, "retarded" idea

Well, yes, I agree.

> This is classic GDPR fear mongering

Well, no. The person who suggested that it's a violation is anti-email, not anti-GDPR; it's implicit that they think it would be a good thing if the CC feature were inherently illegal.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com