I can count the times google has burnt my hand though...
I can count the times google has burnt my hand though...
I've heard of people getting hacked and having huge bills because they stared up bitcoin miners with their account. I think AWS actually refunded the charges.
Scary to think if Google would do the same as easily.
I can confirm that we had that happen to a developer account (who did exactly that <doh>) and AWS refunded the charges with zero hassles.
I'm surprised to hear the Google experience is so poor and risky that no one is using it for fear of losing everything.
Don't get me wrong - I hate it and wish we were on AWS for a multitude of reasons, but we use Google Cloud at Lumen5 and despite my personal distaste for it, it mostly "just works" most of the time, even if almost zero of the setup is intuitive. Their Kubernetes offering is a stronger sell than AWS's (IMO) which is a big reason we've stuck with it.
that is true on the other side too.
Snapchat uses Google Cloud. So does Pokemon Go.
The big question is are those organic customers or attracted onto the platform for big discounts in order to be adverts?
The poster child of unplanned outages and scalability issues. Ouch.
There is also a growing trend of multi cloud deployments - using those that are best for your particular use case or increasing your fault tolerance.
GC should be aggressively isolated from the stupidity in the larger company when it comes to how they incorrectly deal with pretty much anything that involves humans. They'd need to put someone in charge of it that has vast experience building very customer-focused enterprise businesses. They need to de-Googleify the whole business top to bottom. This would also go a long way toward eliminating the well-earned fear about how Google loves to kill off products/services.
If they don't do that, they will never stand a chance competing with Amazon or Microsoft in cloud. They'll be a far smaller, permanent #3 in the US market, best case scenario.