Show HN: Never ask someone more than once to do something - iPrompted
iprompted.com
iprompted.com
- I'd consider it to be a violation of my privacy if someone who wanted to remind me of something shared my contact details with a third party service without getting my permission first.
- I'd consider it to be insulting if someone asked me to do something by sending me automatically generated messages. If it's important enough to remind me about, it's important enough for them to spend the time to send me a personal message. I'd only ever use an app like this to send reminders to myself, and there are already dozens of ways for me to do that (e.g., calendar reminders).
We've thought a lot about how, in the future, we create the ability to accept a prompt, so not just anyone can assign one.
The tool's sweet spot seems to be for people that need to be reminded. We had some interesting anecdotal research that said that the more I have to remind <person that I care about> to do something, the more frustrated I got. By the time the task was completed, it was hard to be appreciative or grateful.
Thanks for your feedback!
:D
No judgement here, I just chuckled and had to say it. (I have had similar thoughts)
Good luck.
Aw shit, I should not say this, but... I once thought up a service where people would sign up to make calls and or send texts. Use cases were:
Get the word out. Politics, fund raisers, events, that sort of thing.
Public service. Warnings, availability of resources.
Deliver short message. Advertising. Think 5 seconds, or a very targeted "tweet" in the form of SMS.
Bounty, info request. Get contact info for X. Or, what system do you use? Who does hiring? Whatever. (Controversial, I know)
The distributed nature of it made blocks hard.
Users, in a short alpha simulation, liked some use cases, hated others. It was difficult to arrive at what activities were worth it.
Since you are entering this space, I will just leave it all here. (Was not for me, for personal reasons)
We want users to view the tool as a virtual assistant, and not as the enemy. Over time we hope to add features like daily summaries, more conversational / nlp understanding and, eventually, the ability to understand what the tasks are about so we can offer positive feedback/encouragement.
We're heading the direction of allowing people to determine who they'll accept tasks from, to keep it from being openly naggy. There's no reason I should be able to task Mark Cuban, just because I have his number (I don't).
Thanks for your feedback!
As you look ahead and folks request more features it could eventually look like (searching... searching... Ok. Found something):
https://codecanyon.net/item/activity-board-activity-manager/... (see screenshots)
At this point, it stops feeling like "nagware" as someone mentioned but a more polished/friendly business/GTD tool. I've used similar to the linked sample in the years past (email notifications only) and it's been very effective for tracking virtually everything.
A response by recipient (person responsible for the task) to the email gets added to the database and keeping track of the progress is available to admin(s), team members or all.
I mention the above only because in it's present state (have not kicked the tires, basing it on the front page, do not want to provide actual cell numbers now) it just seems much easier to directly send a SMS.
Personally, we're focused on a post UI world, where sms / voice + push mechanisms manage you...as opposed to tools that you have to manage yourself. It's really important that we build a relationship between the person designated to do the task and iPrompted.
More to come. Thanks for the feedback!
I accidentally human DDoSd my boss once by submitting multiple Azure support requests at level A and put in his cell phone number. Several support people started responding but they put them all on the same Exchange list so they kept responding to each other and it sent him an email and text. It took hours to clear it up, his phone was so buzzy he had to turn it off all afternoon while I attempted to stop the helper train with more texts, calls, and emails.
I think that is fine if you are wife/husband/mother/daughter/best friend etc. but not something I'd expect a coworker to do to me. Maybe a boss (a bit like a manual pagerduty scenario).
Thanks for your feedback.
The vision is to filter all the noise through iPrompted and give the Assigned, the right info, at the right time, to make sure they accomplish as much as possible.
As we continue to generalize our design, what channels and functionality we support, it seems reasonable we'll land on a protocol that manages "tasks", for lack of a better term, in a post email client world / UI world.
But, we're still validating the MVP. Thank you for your feedback.
> That's the exact type of problem we're trying to solve.
I can't imagine a more wrong solution to that problem.
But, we'll add it to our backlog. When I look at traffic, referrals from HN successfully complete prompts way less than through channels that target people with children. Which, as you can see from your and other comments, isn't at all surprising.