Thats like saying that the market for car parts for fords and chevrolets are separate market and monopolized by ford and chevrolet respectively.
It's bunkum and doesn't fit with 100 years of antitrust law.
It's bunkum and doesn't fit with 100 years of antitrust law.
However, he can buy an aftermarket part. It's a different product but the same market. So they don't have a monopoly.
I don't know much about antitrust law so I can't comment on that But I do understand basic economics. And from an economic perspective, Apple most definitely created a monopoly which they most definitely use for rent seeking.