> That's like saying "Did the judge who took a bribe say anything unreasonable in their ruling?

In fact, it's much more like the attorney is paid, which is considered fine in courts. Indeed, having contributors who are potentially biased, but who each argue their point and agree to a method of conflict resolution, is considered one of the most powerful methods of seeking truth. It's also used in academics, where each researcher bring their own biases to the table.

> Any paid, undisclosed influence is wrong, period.

I guess you didn't read the article? The paid influence was disclosed.