Steal This Presentation
slideshare.net
slideshare.net
Edit: That said, the right visual aids can be important for delivering a powerful message. I found this pretty useful in terms of making great looking slides that will actually help your talk by highlighting key points and keeping people's attention.
I spoke with a "speaking coach" once and this was precisely his advice.
At the time, I was giving him a mock presentation in a small room and I was using a laser-pointer.
He told me "Unless you absolutely have to, NEVER use a laser-pointer. YOU are the presentation. If you have to point out a specific section of your slide, walk up to it and SMACK it with your hand. Then get back to communicating with your audience."
Don Draper doesn't need Powerpoint.
There's nothing wrong with using visual aids to help you deliver your message.
Imagine if he had preceded his visual aids with a couple dozen boards of charts and bullet points, and shrunk the pictures down to quarter size to make room for blocks of text explaining what he was about to say.
Visual aids are great. Projecting the text of your speech on the wall, not so much.
1. Look at your audience, not your slides. They didn't show up to look at the back of your head.
2. Put as little on the screen as possible. If you have more you want them to read/remember afterward, make a handout with the detailed stuff. You want your audience looking at YOU, not a slide on the wall.
Nancy Duarte was handing out copies of her book "Slideology" to speakers at the BIL 2009 conference - it was the best schwag I've ever gotten. I can't recommend her blog enough: http://slideology.com/
There are three "hacks" of a sort I've employed to try to make my talks more engaging, less clunky:
One is to just not use any slides. Show code, run demos, talk about what I'm actually doing on the machine during the talk. I type stuff at a shell prompt or into an editor (embiggen the fonts!) if I need Text on a Screen.
More often I use a simple enhanced-Textile -> HTML/CSS/JS app I wrote. Charcoal background, white text. It's sort of flakey about resizing text for screen rez, which makes it hard to reliably put a lot of text on a slide; this a bug that works for the power of good. I like that I can generate slides from notes, and quickly edit and reload.
My favorite, though also most time-consuming, approach is to hand-draw all the slides. (See http://vimeo.com/13163175 or http://vimeo.com/12993236).
Hand-drawing your slides also has an interesting technological side-effect: depending on what tools you use it becomes much harder to obsess over them and hack on them at the conference right up until you give the talk. I've been using Illustrator on my mac, but my laptops run Ubuntu and/or Win7, neither of which has Illustrator on it. I've done last-minute things in GIMP, but there's strong incentive to avoid that.
Aside form the visual look, a key aspect is duration. I like short talks. 20 minutes, 40 minutes tops. It's hard to compete with twitter, IRC back-channel, and an audience that has a million things they could be doing. Better to leave people wanting more. Generate enough interest to get people curious to learn more, and kick off some hallway discussions.
I thought this pretty weak compared to, for example, "Presentation Secrets of Steve Jobs" by Carmine Gallo.
And... all the plugs for SlideShare in the presentation: what's with that? Started to feel like more of an infomercial than anything. I'd recommend spending 15 minutes just scanning Gallo's book at a book (I did. then bought it anyway.)
Why is it that so many people are trying to tell me how to present my information?
I do use images as recommended, and find that they make great cues for telling stories and fleshing out the idea, but come on...are bullet points really that bad?
The last few presentations I myself have given tended to follow the Lessig style, so instead of bulleted lists, I've presented each item in its own slide. This allowed me to bring the audience's focus on the one thing I'm discussing at the moment, instead of wandering off into what the other items are/could be and how they relate to or contrast with each other.
I read somewhere of the backlash against Powerpoint in the military, and the primary reason stated was the overuse of bulleted lists.
Perhaps it's not the bullets that kill, but the animated ones :)
Even so, I don't believe any slide holds a candle to an exceptionally structured, well-told story. People remember those a lot longer than a pretty deck.
Some of that way-too-much text explains that were this a real, in-person, presentation the text content would be severely cut back.