Can people converse online without filling paragraphs of completely unrelated "witty" jokes in damn near every comment? There used to be actual discourse here.
Good question from gist. Too much childish silliness to bother seeing if anyone has a reasonable response...
On a serious note, he has done a lot and may be taking time off with family and friends. I would love to hang out with him for some time.
https://www.inc.com/kimberly-weisul/paul-graham-female-found...
He was accused of sexism, by someone on Twitter, not #meToo which attributes to the charge of sexual harassment.
But apparently it was in response to an interview he did, that some people felt that some of his comments were sexist.
And this was in 2014. He replied here: http://www.paulgraham.com/ff.html
> It's hard to argue I'm biased against female founders when I have a female cofounder myself
Having your wife as a co-founder and using it to substantiate a lack of bias is like having your father in a company (much older) and using it to say 'I am not biased against older people'. Once again while it doesn't mean someone is biased it doesn't really support the point well and maybe even detracts.
> And with 3 female partners out of 12, YC has slightly over 3x the venture industry average
This is what I call a 'marijuana' comparison. (I am sure there is an exact term for it not what I call it). It's where you try to justify something as 'good' or 'ok' by comparing it to a much worse alternative. Like 'marijuana is not bad compared to alcohol'.