Bootstrap Your Startup to Success Without Venture Capital
theinstitute.ieee.org
theinstitute.ieee.org
I'd be shocked to learn that that failure rate for A-round -funded companies was lower than 60%, where "failure" means "liquidity event that does not beat break-even for investors".
Having been founded and been involved with multiple VC-funded companies: to my mind, the worst thing about VC is that it delays the inevitable. If you can't sell the minimum viable product, you won't sell the 1.0 release. If your minimum viable product requires VC, it isn't minimal. All VC does then is rob you of 1-2 of the most productive years of your life. It creates an illusory high-stakes effort with no payout. It hides the "hustle" part of entrepreneurship (or, worse, outsources it to hired-gun m-teams); if you have hustle, you can get to 1.0 without VC, and if you don't, you fail anyways.
However, the numbers are totally useless. He has only profiled companies from Minnesota, and many of them are over 40 years old. His data may just as well be pointing to differences in availability of venture capital over space and time.