Self-driving cars fail to detect dark-skinned pedestrians
vox.com
vox.com
Increasing the diversity of the team members might be good for reducing bias, but the fact remains that darker skinned people are harder for machine vision systems to work with due to the lack of contrast.
Like that fuss a few years ago with the laptops (I want to say it was Toshiba but I'm not certain) not being able to use facial recognition to unlock the OS.
Also, this seems to be only vision systems - you'd hope LIDAR would be able to detect a pedestrian regardless of skin color.
Is it also harder for human drivers?
Step 2 - show that the model detects dark-skinned pedestrians 5% less often than light-skinned pedestrians
Step 3 - write a clickbait title implying that self-driving cars will run down dark-skinned pedestrians with precisely zero evidence
Step 4 - post the article on HN with an even more inflammatory title than the actual article
Take this up with HN
1. The study talks about how some vision-based object detection systems don't work as well on black people.
2. The articles makes the leap to self driving cars, ignoring that self driving cars uses Lidar and probably custom made algorithms. To their credit they do say that it's a "potential risk".
3. Everybody shares (including this HN submission) or rewrite the article dropping the "potential" part.
If a automated car is better at detecting threats on the road than humans then there is little point to using them.