Homebrew installs the GNU Core Utilities with the g- prefix, and checking now I see it's available as gshuf.
I see a couple of problems with how it's used in this essay:
cat big_csv.csv | shuf | head -n 50 > sample_from_big_csv.csv
Since shuf's -n option is "output at most COUNT lines", there should be no need for the head: cat big_csv.csv | shuf -n 50 > sample_from_big_csv.csv
In principle this should be faster because there's less I/O, and it should take less memory if shuf implements the -n option using something like reservoir sampling. (EDIT: it does - https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/tree/src/shu... )Also, since shuf takes a filename, it could be:
shuf -n 50 < big_csv.csv> sample_from_big_csv.csv
However, in terms of data science, don't most CSV files contain a header? Most of mine do, and the example 'data.csv' has the header "var_x".Using "shuf" means there's a very high chance that the sampled CSV file either won't include the header line, or will have it somewhere other than the first line.
Doesn't that mean that most data scientists will rarely use 'shuf' for sampling from CSV files?
The GNU utils are usually the way to go; the Mac/Darwin/BSD variants have some weird quirks and usually aren't worth the bother to fight with. awk and sort are notably deficient.
Ease off the "data science" a tad--this is just scripting, a perfectly honorable pastime! Why else would GNU coreutils exist in the first place?
It's awkward to preserve a header using shuf, even with head/tail. Here's what I came up with:
head -1 x.csv && (awk 'NR>1' x.csv | shuf -n 5)
My point is that "shuf" is GNU specific, while the author said it was a Unix tool like the other ones. Linux != Unix. Also, there are no Mac/Darwin/BSD variants of shuf."Ease off"? Why? The term "data scientist" appear in the title and each of the first three paragraphs, and the comment I replied to was "I would be a little bit shocked if any of the data scientists at my day job didn't know all seven of these". I want to know why data scientists who work with CSV files should be using shuf and not some more appropriate tool like csvkit.
That is, the entire topic is about scripting as applied to data science, not "just scripting".
< foo.csv (read -r head; echo “$head”; shuf -n 50)
If you do this a lot, you could combine the read/echo into a single shell function.My beef with "data science" is that this is not science--it's even less science than political science--it's munging.
RFC 4180 says a CSV field can span multiple lines. Section 2.6:
> Fields containing line breaks (CRLF), double quotes, and commas should be enclosed in double-quotes.
You asked "Can backslash escape quote (or other) characters". 4180 says "no", and that double-double quoting is used. The grammar in 2.7 is:
> escaped = DQUOTE *(TEXTDATA / COMMA / CR / LF / 2DQUOTE) DQUOTE
The RFC says that the MIME type should use header=present or header=absent to indicate if the first line is a header. "Implementors choosing not to use this parameter must make their own decisions as to whether the header line is present or absent."
I have never seen a CSV file with comments.
Note also that the Python csv module, which supports a large number of CSV dialects, also does not support comments.
While you have a beef, that doesn't change that you wanted to drag me off topic (from "data science" to "just scripting"), when my point was that that example wasn't a good data science example in the first place. It also isn't a good scripting example.
Randomly samples CSV data uniformly using memory proportional to the size of
the sample.
When an index is present, this command will use random indexing if the sample
size is less than 10% of the total number of records. This allows for efficient
sampling such that the entire CSV file is not parsed.
This command is intended to provide a means to sample from a CSV data set that
is too big to fit into memory (for example, for use with commands like 'xsv
frequency' or 'xsv stats'). It will however visit every CSV record exactly
once, which is necessary to provide a uniform random sample. If you wish to
limit the number of records visited, use the 'xsv slice' command to pipe into
'xsv sample'.
Usage:
xsv sample [options] <sample-size> [<input>]
xsv sample --help
Common options:
-h, --help Display this message
-o, --output <file> Write output to <file> instead of stdout.
-n, --no-headers When set, the first row will be consider as part of
the population to sample from. (When not set, the
first row is the header row and will always appear
in the output.)
-d, --delimiter <arg> The field delimiter for reading CSV data.
Must be a single character. (default: ,) tail +2 cat myfile | tail -n +2 | shuf -n 50One command I didn't see mentioned that was surprising was cut[1], especially the -d flag. (Maybe it's less necessary if you know awk?)
It's really great for cleaning up the output of poorly structured, wordy scripts. It's also a quick and dirty way to generate csvs with the –output-delimiter flag.
[1]https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/cut-command-linux-examples/