There are some web frameworks in there that are fairly impressive.
There is very little advertising going on. It goes a bit back to what your folks mentioned here, a bit of dejection and being condescending to other languages. Common Lisp is the only language with reasonable compile-time computing right now, and it is hard to bring that concept over to people who still think about writing software, as opposed to living with changing software for 30 years. So the Lisp community is a bit in the mindset that those who get it do so on their own, and software is distributed among those who already know they want.
The Cando chemical computation system (based on Clasp) in the video posted below/above is open source, BTW.
How does D compare, with its CTFE (Compile-Time Function Evaluation/Execution)?
Interestingly, it was originally written in Python, but the author decided to rewrite the entire thing in Common Lisp due mainly to Python's poor performance and the lack of native thread support. The result Common Lisp version is 30 times faster than the old Python one. More info can be found in the author's blog post [1].
[1] https://tapoueh.org/blog/2014/05/why-is-pgloader-so-much-fas...
I need to get cracking on backporting the changes we made to cl-jupyter for Cando/Clasp to portable Common Lisp tho. Sigh. So little time.
https://nfsforwindows.com/home
(It's open source but uses features of a proprietary CL implementation: https://github.com/franzinc/nfs )