We should not allow a huge negative behaviour every single day, just on the off chance that there’s a possibility it would restrict us in a very unusual event.
Hundreds of people should die because maybe we can save a few?
Makes no sense.
Freedom has value. Just because we can force some people to do some things more safely in some cases doesn't mean we should always do it. Otherwise, we can just outlaw cars entirely and force everyone to only go places where rails take them at government-approved speeds.
"In Rheinland-Pfalz, a 130 km speed limit was also introduced on a 167km section of the A61 in 1991 and has been retained since then. This measure was combined with a ban on overtaking for heavy good vehicles. The impact of these two measures was a 30% reduction in fatal and severe injury accidents (comparing one year after and one year before their introduction – Rheinland-Pfalz Ministry of Transport)."
2] You can drive super dangerous without driving super fast
3] Almost no one drives super fast
4] The same pdf also says the death rate is exactly the same on roads without speed limits as those with speed limits... but I assume we're going to ignore that part and other contradictory studies to drive your point home?
i.e. 67% of roads have no permanent limit, 67% of deaths occur there...
And then you'll say "yes but that doesn't take into account the traffic volume on those stretches of road"
and I'll point to something else, and it'll get old, and you don't appear interested in considering other viewpoints anyway.