Parents who digitize their babies’ lives
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
Is it really asking too much for the CEO to have a legal- and engineering-approved answer to this question?
I mean, I’m glad he’s being honest, but it clearly shows that he’s out of touch with his customers if he hasn’t familiarized himself with the basic details of one of consumers’ biggest concerns in this domain.
I hear privacy concerns mentioned by people a lot, but in the non-tech crowd I see nearly zero online behaviour that values privacy. One of us is making incorrect assumptions about user behaviour and privacy wishes. I hope it’s me.
I heard a lot about people's privacy. Most non-tech people I talk with see Google as a faceless evil corporation that wants to control humanity.
But, they use Facebook, and browse the web while logged in in GMail, Facebook, etc. instead of opening a private tab.
That is the problem with lack of knowledge. People don't trust big corporations, sometimes to irrational extends. But, they do not understand how the technology really works.
If we want behaviour and concern to be one consequence of the other, we need better education and more government action.
I think government action would more align with the realities of better education. The better education aspect, however, relies on people being willing to keep-up with the growth of technology after their compulsory education ends; which is, probably, going to be your hardest sell.
For those of us, for whom technology is a an every-day necessity and/or the source of our income, that premise in the interests of continued education in technology seems second nature. However, if you compare that to doctors, they're primary concern is keeping up with medical trends; so, this might be a harder "sell" to them.
Instead, much like other professions have governing bodies, technology should probably have it's own. I'm thinking along the lines of things like doctors and medical review boards or lawyers and the BAR.
However, there is another caveat that the governments benefit from: Ineptitude around technology is what governments actually benefit from. Telling the governments that they should care more about education around technology and creating laws to protect basic rights is going to be a hard-sell to some of them. Take the current issue with the US law versus the GDPR for a principal example.
I don't pretend to have an answer but, to me, it generally comes down to whether the government is far more concerned with the welfare of itself than the welfare of people (in general).
As a hacker news member we are first movers. Privacy concerns become bigger with scale. When we join a service we have a choice and we see no privacy issue. OTOH at the scale when privacy becomes an issue there is no longer a choice.
Pair that with the need to grow the user base for investors above all other metrics.
Yesterday afternoon I had a beer with a neighbour and some of his friends while sitting in the sun.
‘Social network’ doesn’t have to mean internet based.
Edit: The irony of posting this...
I’ve been trying to evangelize non tech friends/family about privacy in general and the reactions are not great.