America's love of luxury toilet paper is destroying Canadian forests
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
With a bidet, it doesn't matter what kind of toilet paper you have, because it's just for drying. NOT using a bidet means effectively smearing your waste all over your backside because it won't get fully clean without water, which is tbh just plain disgusting and unsanitary.
Even a hand bidet like those in the middle East are a huge improvement, and can be bought for $30 on Amazon.
Or you can go super cheap and get a $20-50 version with unheated water.
https://www.apartmenttherapy.com/review-toilet-seat-bidets-f...
Its really mind blowing to me that if someone smears a cake on your face, you wash it with soap, but use TP to clean feaces.
Why use so much paper and do so mich environmental damage, if you can just use water for a better cleansing outcome.
Well that's super helpful. Who buys it by the pound? Sheets of paper, or rolls, yes I could visualise and compare. Not even how many football fields it covers!
Sounds like a heck of a lot. Probably.
Using more than that it’s probably cheaper to buy a Toto with the bidet.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/earth-talks-bidet...
"Popular everywhere except North America, where Americans use 36.5 billion rolls of toilet paper annually, switching to bathroom bidets could save some 15 million trees.... 'This also involves 473,587,500,000 gallons of water to produce the paper and 253,000 tons of chlorine for bleaching.” He adds that manufacturing requires about 17.3 terawatts of electricity annually....'
[0]: https://hellotushy.com/products/tushy-bamboo-toilet-paper
Perhaps we should tax wood fiber to point of where we're all forced to use recycled stuff or we have to switch back to using old newspaper (as was the case when I was a kid). Nowadays we no longer use nasty antimony printing plates, so we've no longer any reasonable excuse not to.
Reckon, many could perhaps do with a stint in the army to toughen up their posteriors. I recall the stuff it issued was only marginally better than using leaf droppings.