I'm curious, why the hard stance on granting purchase data?
I'm curious, why the hard stance on granting purchase data?
Plenty of companies gain access to privileged information for a specific purpose, but utilize that privileged access in completely opaque ways to create secondary revenue streams. Unroll.me[1][2] is an example of this, as is the countless apps that ask for location services access for specific functionality within the app, but then resell that location data to third parties for ad/marketing/consumer intelligence purposes. With weather and news apps being the worst offenders.
Since you have a CPA on-staff, your usage may be bound by law[3] to not be used in such a manner. But I have no idea if so. And without that guarantee, it's pretty terrifying to give you direct access to my accounts. There's a whole lot of signal intelligence in that you can glean. If you're using something like Plaid for automatic transaction aggregation, they even come with several nifty prebuilt endpoints[4] for you to leverage that authorization to get a complete view of my assets, an estimate of my income, and a live view of all of my account balances. Outside of a relationship that has privacy and confidentiality guarantees enshrined in law, that isn't a level of insight I want to grant to third parties.
[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/24/technology/personal-data-...
[2] https://unroll.me/your-data
[3] https://www.bna.com/confidentiality-tax-practice-n7301447401...