> Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Actual title is "Accepting Bitcoin as a Small Business – 4 Years In"
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Actual title is "Accepting Bitcoin as a Small Business – 4 Years In"
I viewed it as a useful summary of the article, quoting from the article, not editorializing.
> We think accepting Bitcoin is a positive move for your small business. While you may not get anyone paying in it now, it does come with other added benefits
The change of title clearly misrepresents author's message by picking a single fact without context. It doesn't matter if you agree with the author, the message conveyed in modified title is very different from what the article talks about. Don't like the message? Write your own blog post. But don't misrepresent others' intentions.
Do I sense another ulterior motive for you to force the title to change? I've definitely seen this behavior on Reddit.
If the case is valid for the rule, motives or biases like mine, yours or anyone's are irrelevant.
It doesn't? The moral of the story is bitcoin hasn't been adopted as much as the bitcoin fanboys will scream.