Looks like YT wrote back to that post to say that's not true?
"...Channels will not get deleted if you re-enable comments--can you send us the post where you saw that?"
"...Channels will not get deleted if you re-enable comments--can you send us the post where you saw that?"
It appears that he saw demonetization and mistook that as deletion.
That said, for some channels, demonetization means effectively shutting down the channel.
Video that include minors and are at risk of predatory comments may receive limited or no ads (yellow icon). If you think we made a mistake please appeal [link]. We will continue to refine our approach in the coming weeks and months.
Is misstaken as deletion? English is not my first language, but I have a hard time reading this as "we may delete your channel".
Even without monetization, the community/discoverability benefits of YT have to be appealing. As much distaste as I have for Google, the ability to find a plurality (at least) of the content related to my area of interest in one place is quite appealing.
- We will stop giving you money
- We will force you to stop by delete the channel
I guess it can feel the same for many creators and be the same thing when communicating on twitter. (No sarcasm intended)
If i understand the twitter thread correctly, he referens that ads can decrease, and this somehow in his mind means that YT will delete his channel...
Edit: In my world, that is called a lie.
And well, who wants to advertize if the comments is full of pedophils?