e.g. USB 3.2 has the same connector as USB-C
edit: I personally care far more about the connector than exact specs of each version
* USB 3.2 Gen 1 5 Gbps (formerly USB 3.1 Gen 1) (formerly USB 3.0)
* USB 3.2 Gen 2 10 Gbps (formerly USB 3.1 Gen 2)
* USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20 Gbps
Literally everyone that came up with this ridiculous naming scheme and literally everyone who approved it should never be allowed to participate in a working group ever again. This level of incompetency is just absurd. These people cannot be allowed to pollute critical standards with their terrible ideas.
USB-C is a connector, so you cannot say "has the same connector as USB-C".
It is the only connector for USB 3.2, and a connector that is compatible with USB 3.1 Gen 2.
Edit: I meant it is the only connector for USB 3.2 "Gen 2x2", and compatible with 3.1 Gen 2 (now called 3.2 Gen 2)
From what I've been able to find, not even that is reliably true. Looks like the older connectors can be labeled USB 3.2 as long as they use the "x1" scheme in the label and are capable of reaching the speed of that scheme.
hopefully usb-c connectors are tougher then micro-usb's