Just blocking it yourself seems like a better solution. You dont have to be fair in what you block yourself and (surprise surprise) you dont need to watch it in the first place.
Just blocking it yourself seems like a better solution. You dont have to be fair in what you block yourself and (surprise surprise) you dont need to watch it in the first place.
How does that work if nobody watches it, how do you know what to block?
You only have to watch it through if you have to make sure its actually gore. Which an individual different to an employee doesnt have to.
Or simply automatically collect reports and if a high enough percentage of views vs reports comes in it put it nsfw.
I'm not sure that is any different than what the article describes.
>It’s a place where employees can be fired for making just a few errors a week
As I understand it, an employee has to make sure its extremely likely that it is a murder. She is told she can pause it by the psychiatrist, not to close it. You as an individual dont need to find out. Just close it immediately if you assume its gore.
I don't know what you mean by that. If you visit facebook, you don't get to pick what you see. Certainly a few seconds of a murder is going to be less than desirable.
> Certainly a few seconds of a murder is going to be less than desirable.
While not desirable, outsourcing your second every few days to some poor guy who has to watch it all day long doesnt sound like a good solution to me.
I dont think its a simple problem. It is one without an optimal solution. I just think the downsides of having the stuff around are preferable to having people ruining their mental health out of financial desperation.
I also believe that the reliability would go up with time, people are able to learn quite a lot.
Not a popular opinion, but its not reasonable to let kids have access to the current version of the internet and childproofing it is not a viable option. A lot of the issues we currently have with the internet can be boiled down to the contradiction of kids using it and the inability to child proof it. If we think that kids shouldnt have access to everything the internet allows access to, it should be feasible to get a second child proofed one online. With the focus on it being child proofed in mind during design, the maintenance wouldnt be that bad if you focus on access control. Kids are not allowed to walk into a sex shop or a bar, they get the internet right on their phone.