Yep. Lot's of "data analysis" without even defining what would be a "false positive" (someone who did well in an interview, got an offer but turned out to be a bad hire? how is TB exposed to that critical data exactly?)
(Of course, you can argue that 3 months of employment isn't enough - but it's a lot more performance data than a bunch of interviews gives.)
Then I really have to question exactly how they did this analysis. I can't imagine most companies would have the same objective function.