How come there was no big outcry over The Patriot Act, warrantless wiretaps, CCTV all over, enhanced interrogation, suspension of haebeous corpus.. etc...?
On the other hand, most people would be bothered if I touched their balls or viewed nude pictures of them on my computer.
Apparently some people feel similarly about homeland security doing these things.
I think part of the reason for the lack of outrage over The Patriot Act was the timing. When the Patriot Act was created, it was a short enough time after 9/11 that the US was still strongly emotionally effected by it. It was easier to say "This will prevent terrorism" and be believed.
Years later, it's become easier to take a rational look at the risks and benefits, and see that it's unlikely that such measures will prevent enough terrorism to outweigh the costs.