Google will spend $13B on U.S. real estate in 2019
cnbc.com
cnbc.com
On the other hand, if you step away from the economics, you'll have a better idea of why it's a bad sign for the company if they're blowing huge cash on buildings. The best secular reason this is a bad move is that it signals a change in the organization's ego. People build these things under the premise that (1) it's important to have glossy buildings to attract junior talent, and (2) it's important to have glossy buildings to retain senior talent. That's definitely the case with academia too.
But Google ain't Harvard, its brand can turn on a dime, and I can guarantee you that 22 year old compsci grads and 50 year old product management vice presidents who think the glossiness of the building is important are much bigger shitbags than 18 year old college applicants and 70 year old professors who might think so too.
Could you elaborate on that? I feel like those labels could all describe the same people depending on their life experiences. The psychological factors that result in high-achievers in academia and industry seeking prestige are too subtle for me to understand well enough to think of any of these people as “shitbags”.
These kinds of hateful websites have always been around, but we didn't have registrars and hosts trying to censor them until 2016 or so.
But the midtown office where developers worked (and user group meetups were hosted) has been closed for several years now. To my knowledge, that was the end of developers or data scientists based out of Atlanta (except for remote workers, perhaps).
Several actually, and they employ more than you think. Automation folks, facilities specialists, logistics folks, sysadmin types, catering, project managers, network engineers, and yes even some developers, etc...
Every large company with their eyes open will be buying real estate as part of that tax plan benefit.