There's No Such Thing as Real Vegetarians

This seems just like either a ridiculous cry for attention, or else another philosopher that is lost in relativism.

There are many good arguments for saying vegetarianism is ethically not strong enough (e.g. the amount of critters killed in modern agriculture) but this ain't one.

And even then - if vegetarianism in his world is not ethically defensible then eating animals would be even less defensible. Settle on the smaller evil and you're good to go from the position of most ethical systems.

He just forgot the "What if you're stranded on deserted island" argument. Should one really waste time and attention on this?