That’s a legitimate decision responding to their environment – you might disagree because you have different goals and resource levels but it’s wortb understanding why not everyone makes the same call.
That’s a legitimate decision responding to their environment – you might disagree because you have different goals and resource levels but it’s wortb understanding why not everyone makes the same call.
I do frequently. There are many things in life that are hard and cross-browser CSS is not among them.
In the past I have found things like Bootstrap and jQuery to be more of a frustration than a benefit by introducing cross-browser differences in their attempt to help. At the same time they don't fix the cross browser differences that really impact layout, such as differences in font rendering.
And jquery support often isn't necessary at the moment. It's required for some functionality, but many simpler web pages will work with a slim version of the CSS without any JS. Makes it very light-weight and still easy to set up.