I doubt you’ll see this attitude at GM (despite unions) or Archer Daniels Midland, etc., because they don’t try to play both sides as much.
I doubt you’ll see this attitude at GM (despite unions) or Archer Daniels Midland, etc., because they don’t try to play both sides as much.
If you take a progressive social stance like the tech companies seem to like to do, with LGBT rights for example, then you're opening yourself up to criticism when you behave like a regular corporation in a place where you might not have taken a social stance, with the labor movement for example.
This image of the protective tent failing to cover everyone is the best representation I've seen:
https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/12884861/t...
Tangentially: Young me was all-or-nothing, and hated compromise. Middle aged me grew to appreciate incrementalism. Older me is rediscovering my inner ultimatist.
Hostage negotiator Chris Voss' prescription for successful negotiations is "Never split the difference." After witnessing the backlash to every progressive reform, I'm VERY open to adopting Voss' worldview.
Basically, I've adopted a "Leave no one behind." worldview.
I'm not aware of a term that means what you describe, perhaps it would be tied-in somehow with arguments about "equity vs equality."
There are arguments on both sides eg a Freelance Director of Photography is not going to want to be taxed as an employee.