Strange way of saying "who is neither a biologist or climate scientist".
And, of course, you can't _become_ a credentialed biologist or climate scientist unless you keep reciting the party line on global warming.
Being smart isn't just thinking of new stuff. It also includes understanding the world and it's proven qualities, properties and processes.
History is full of really smart people believing some pretty stupid things, especially in areas outside of their area of expertise. We have a very one-dimensional view of intelligence that assumes that because someone is smart (or even a genius) in one way, or knowledgeable about one area, that this must automatically apply to every facet of intelligence or knowledge.
Smart people are still people, with all the same biases, preconceptions, ego and other human frailties.
For some reason some physicists in particular seem very prone to underestimating the complexity of other branches of science, and over-estimating the applicability of their ways of working to them, especially the biological sciences which are full of complex systems that often turn out to react in unexpected ways.
The point of my comment was that just because someone is a genius, does not automatically make them right. The fact that Linua Pauling was very wrong about vitamin C mega-dosing doesn't stop him from being one of the greatest scientists of the 20th century, and someone who was right about an awful lot of things.
> Sorry but you can't be one of the smartest human beings alive if you question settled science like evolution and climate change.
Climate change is not settled science. It's model building. It isn't really possible to set up experiments where you can control variables and test hypotheses (because there's only one Earth). In that respect, it shares more in common with economics than physics, chemistry, or biology. Everyone takes economists' projections with a grain of salt. Yet the complex inter-dependent ecologies that we call Earth are way more complex than the global economy. So maybe we should be a little more guarded in our statements about what we know about how climate works.
Just some food for thought.