18' Canoe from One Sheet of Plywood
koti.kapsi.fi
koti.kapsi.fi
All told I spent just over $100 and the project took about 2 long weekends. I used fiberglass to cover the exterior and the boat is still in great shape today (though sadly underused).
According to this chart: http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/attachments/fiberglass-comp...
The fiberglass weight would be under 3lbs.
For the plywood - 3 pounds per square foot per inch of thickness according to APA Plywood Design Specification so
= .25 thickness * 8 width * 4 height * 3 lbs
= 32/4 * 3
= 8 * 3
= 24lbs plywood weight
So I'd say the boat was between 25-30lbs and that feels about right.
Still, I'd love to see what additions such as AeroGel powders and carbon nanotube fibers would do to the weight of a rigid boat such as a canoe.
I think another design challenge would be a fold-able plastic one ala camping flatware (http://www.orikaso.com/)
http://content.asce.org/conferences/nccc2011/index.html
http://content.asce.org/conferences/nccc2011/gallery.html
Winning team design papers 2000-2010:
http://www.engr.wisc.edu/studentorgs/canoe/designpapers/inde...
Looking at the 1st place PDF for the UNR team, and the admixture they have come up with; I have always wondered if AeroGel would be a suitable additive to the mixture in place of some of the other components.
AeroGel would additionally replace the glass aggregates mentioned in the PDF as well.
For example, they use polyvinyl fibers to add durability and flexibility to the mixture, as well as some other pre-stressing substance known as Komponent, which I am not familiar with.
I have always thought that it would be interesting to add powdered, or fibrous (if it exists) AeroGel to concrete for both insulating purposes (in the non-concrete-canoe use case) and weight reduction (canoe centric).
Additionally, once a fairly cheap, abundant source of carbon nanotube fibers could be procured - adding this to the mix as admixture to provide for strength and flexibility would be great. (I don't have access to either materials - so this is all speculative with respect to practicality.)
I could not, with my current tools/skills build the boat in your link but I could, however, build the plywood boat.
Still, anything well made in wood, by hand, has a certain innate beauty that I always appreciate.
In other parts of the world the boat in the article might be considered a canoe, but I would say not in Canada. </canadian-pedantic>
Not sure about Finland (where the article's author lives), but a wide, fat open canoe is actually called "a Canadian" in many parts of northern Europe.
The concept of an "open kayak" sounds pretty confused, though, given how they were originally built (skins wrapped around a thin wooden frame) and used (coastal sea regions, including the open sea).
"<more pedantic>" is poorly formed.
</highly_pedantic>