An Open Question to Path: What distinguishes your app from Instagram?

What distinguishes Canon from Nikon?

Having used both services for a few months, I would say I only post "artsy" photos to Instagram, ruthlessly filtering on aesthetics while I find myself posting "inside jokes" to close friends on Path.

It's probably less interesting to quibble about how these apps are different than it is to ask why are the apps taking off now in the first place? Is the next generation of photography hardware agnostic, relying instead on the social features? Overall, what do people take more photos of: art or their friends?

If that is the case, betting on the Facebook guys may not be such a bad move...

"Why would you need this many employees to build this?"

How many employees at Path?

Now, now, children. There are enough cookies to go around.

This question assumes that there is something valuable that Instagram does that Path is "copying" in some way.

Instagram does a good job of quickly taking photos, applying filters, and then uploading them to your choice of social photo sites. That's something any number of us here could code up in an afternoon with all the APIs and toolkits available on the iPhone/these services.

As far as intimacy and close privacy are concerned...why not just go email. People will upload these "intimate or personal" pictures ...and then later complain about privacy concerns. Why all this struggle and buzz. If you want privacy, stay offline or go email.no need for a new app for that. Seriously.

Dunbar's number is real. However the truth of the number is from research of Apes.

I am excited for Path, but until it works on Palm Pre and Android, it just wont be for me and my friends.

Even the kids know that.

"50 is the new .edu" Exclusivity & Privacy. You can be yourself.

Instagram adds cool effects and helps you share.

Did you even read about them?