Sure you could use it in your smart contract, but it has the same kind of risks as using Tether. I think it can be dangerous to build layers of decentralized apps on top of something that's not.
(Or maybe I'm not understanding it correctly)
Sure you could use it in your smart contract, but it has the same kind of risks as using Tether. I think it can be dangerous to build layers of decentralized apps on top of something that's not.
(Or maybe I'm not understanding it correctly)
- How to programmatically/formally measure/characterize decentralization ?
- How to show the decentralization level of a particular dApp function execution to the user ?
In that case, a contract could be totally decentralized but the monetary value part of WBTC is external and centralized. That could be potentially very confusing and unexpected for a user if the WBTC redeeming process ultimately fell through, and they may come to blame other unrelated parts of the process.
For example Liquid does this: https://blockstream.com/liquid/
DAI is the USD stablecoin, overcollateralized by ETH and a variety of other ERC-20 tokens. And managed in a decentralized manner by MakerDAO token holders. A good experiment to watch imo