The Roomba lawnmower is finally happening
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
I don't know why they are uncommon here as lawns are just as popular as they are in other countries.
Labor and capital(robotics) are substitutes. Thus in a cheap labor market (USA) anybody that would use a robot instead simply uses human landscapers.
It is quite common in the USA to see humans doing what would be automated work in First world countries.
I'm not sure though --- I think it might be that Americans tend to have a different relation to their lawns than Europeans. I was surprised to read that mowing your lawn on Sunday is illegal in Norway, with a silent robotic mower being a legal workaround: https://www.newsinenglish.no/2015/07/27/conflicts-arise-over...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_World
I get what you're going for, HN loves to hate on the US.
> It is quite common in the USA to see humans doing what would be automated work in other First world countries.
I get what you're going for, HN loves to not give any benefit of doubt.
Are these safe enough to justify use?
I wonder what the equivalent of that will be for the outdoors?
The safety implications worry me too. I'm surprised they don't discuss this in the article.
This is simply one company coming late to a crowded market and hoping for some press.
if (dogTurdContact) { wipe() }
I'm sure this isn't nearly as much of a problem as it is indoors.