I added this one to make it even clearer: "So you can be safe and sure: You can make commercial projects by using all music on WOWA, you just can't sell the music as it is or create another "WOWA" with this music."
Thanks
- 'no copyright'
- 'CC0'
- 'you just can't sell the music as it is'
It is not possible that all of these things are true at the same time.
For example by claiming CC0 you have waived 'all of [your] rights to the work worldwide under copyright law', but then you try to assert the right to tell me not to sell them? How do you think this works?
if I read the official CC0 Page it fits completely https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.en
I will study the topic even more and provide a suitable declaration. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
thank you
IANAL, but yes, I think your license is not CC0.
CC0 is "public domain". It is intended to abandon all copyrights. So if you want to publish music under the license, you can't argue any restriction.
And, Unsplash license is currently not CC0. It WAS originally CC0.
I like your philosophy, so I want to agree with you, but I cannot help concerning about licensing issues on FLOSS or mix-in usages...
References:
https://medium.com/unsplash/why-we-moved-from-the-creative-c...
http://wpandlegalstuff.com/unsplash-gpl-compatibility-concer...
https://make.wordpress.org/themes/handbook/review/resources/...
I think they also have a great business model in general.