Hacker News Reader

Comment by dawhizkid | Hacker News Reader

Interesting thing I discovered when I was concerned about SFO delays is that SFO is one of the few airports in the U.S. that does not use TSA for security...it hires its own private security officers.

Edit: For those curious, these airports have private security (SFO is by far the largest as far as I can tell): https://www.tsa.gov/for-industry/screening-partnerships

View on HN

Does this mean the airports experiencing a crippling loss of federal personnel could simply hire them onto their own payroll (the same people, even)? In such a case, all airports could keep functioning independent of government aid -- theoretically, anyway.

That is how the entire system use to operate:

> Prior to September 11, 2001, airport screening was provided in the U.S. by private companies contracted by the airline or airport.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airport_security_repercussions...

Leaving our airport infrastructure dependent on the dysfunctional federal government was another downside to the nationalization of most of airport security.

I'd prefer it to be this way. Airports could hire their own screeners, set their own rules, and they wouldn't be as affected by this shutdown. I think it'd be interesting to have airports do the same thing with air traffic controllers, with both airlines and airports kicking in equal amounts of money to employ and train them.

> Interesting thing I discovered when I was concerned about SFO delays is that SFO is one of the few airports in the U.S. that does not use TSA for security...it hires its own private security officers.

Yeah but this article is about the FAA staff, not the TSA or security staff.

SFO's private security has no bearing on this outcome.

Whoa, really? Do you know whether/which other airports are like this?

most others on here are small airports https://www.tsa.gov/for-industry/screening-partnerships

Oh wow thank you!

Reply on news.ycombinator.com