It's commonly understood (but possibly wrong?) that this is how they bin multicore processors. That it's highly likely that a quad-core and a dual-core CPU began life as identical twins, but one or two cores on the dual-core SKU didn't pass muster.
If that's remotely true, and their product offer/lineup is built around the failure rates, single-core CPUs would have resulted in staggering numbers of failures, since a single defective core meant a trashcan rather than a down-SKU.
(If the original supposition is true, then it's highly likely GPU, flash, ram etc work on the same principle. Anywhere you have a die with multiple repetitive units, where a die with less units still has market value, it seems like a sensible way to recoup value on what would otherwise be discards.)