Does this thread add any value relative to the other, which directly links to Tesla's own company update?
Not really, other than adding the ever more present BBC spin on things :/
The sensationalism of saying "3.000", which sounds worse than "7%".
With both figures being accurate, I'm not sure choosing the statistic which acknowledges the actual people affected rather than the statistic which turns them into a performance metric is "sensationalism", especially when the 7% figure is also covered in the first sentence of the article.