>"Assuming what you say is true"

Don't take my word for it. Follow the links to what the primary literature says.

>"being next to useless for meaningful physics or medical news"

Well, to be fair the "amyloid hypothesis" is still the mainstream hypothesis. It's just that this is for reasons that are baffling to me. Afaict, it has nothing going for it at all vs the prior "cholinergic" hypothesis (which has resulted in treatments that actually appear to do something for the patient).