Hostile takeover effort by Valor of XRP | Hacker News Reader

Hostile takeover effort by Valor of XRP

axios.com

34 pointsokfine31 comments

If only the cryptocurrency market were even rational enough for this to work. You have projects like ETC and the many Bitcoin forks that are total junk clones but still have value. You have projects like Tron which plagiarizes their whitepaper and clone ETH and still has value. You have Dash which cloned Monero and the founders took all the coin and it still has value.

Dash / Darkcoin existed before Monero. Still shitcoins, but get the facts right.

You might be right but honestly I'm too lazy to verify. We both agree on the fundamentals anyway

Monero forked Bytecoin, and it's worth much more. Always found that somewhat amusing.

Bytecoin is a scam, whereas Monero is at least pretending to be a well-behaved open-source project. Also, there was a ton of innovations since the fork.

Yes! And not only that, but the initial distribution was fair

Apparently they've been working on forking out the overdistributed initial Bytecoins. My only concern with Bytecoin atm is they've apparently patented their approach, where that would lead Monero is uncertain to me. I was going to try and reimplement Bytecoin (in another language so I could learn more about how Bytecoin works) but I couldnt get an answer from someone from their group as to what the heck it means that they're patenting it.

I mean, rationally speaking the value of all cryptocurrencies should tend toward zero. But then again, rationally speaking the value of all currency should tend to zero.

Human beings aren't exactly rational - if we were, the modern world would cease to exist, and we'd collapse into a Hobbesian state of nature.

Your definition of rationality sounds a bit weird. All currencies should be valued at zero, which currently are you pricing those currencies?

That's not true for all currency. Because Governments generally require taxation to be paid on property/transactions/income in particular geographical areas exclusively in a particular currency, there is a baseline demand which means that such a currency has some fundamental value despite not having "intrinsic" value.

Beyond that, currencies are (in a way) also backed to some extent by the value of the goods and services available to be purchased with them.

So cryptocurrencies can have value of the second type, but if they don't have baseline demand then there's little to stop everybody deciding to switch from one cryptocurrency to another at some point in time, leaving the first worthless - whereas baseline demand makes that extremely unlikely for a currency used in any major country's economy.

Taxation does create demand for government currencies, but it doesn't necessarily make it more usable in commerce. You could do all your transactions in other currencies, and only convert to the tax currency when you need to pay taxes.

Presuming you can convert freely and you're not actually paid in it. Soviet states and foreign currencies, does anyone remember that?

Considering the first order effect, you are right. But because governments tax only in their currency, they have a vested interest in making their currency valuable. This makes the US dollar more reliable than your friend's IOU for a favor.

Governments are social constructions too. They can & do fail - we tend to forget about this in the developed world because our governments haven't failed within our lifetimes (though in much of Europe, only just barely, and in Eastern Europe / Russia / China that's not true at all), but it's a regular occurrence in other parts of the world. When a government fails its power to tax becomes void, and so (usually) does its currency.

The alternative - for someone wishing to transact in an alternative currency and not pay taxes - is to pay foreign or private powers for protection services and then simply not pay the tax. This is suicide in the U.S. because we have a large & well-organized military, but is commonplace in many other parts of the world - and indeed, the U.S. is frequently the foreign power supplying arms and accepting its currency for many of these rebel groups.

A perpetual ponzi scheme will go on forever, because there’s always a endless stream of people who think it’s the person in front of them whose the sucker and not them. That is, even when people KNOW it’s a Ponzi scheme they will still play the game.

That’s the crypto market. Each coin is as close to a perpetual ponzi scheme as you can get. The coins won’t be worthless until there is only a single sucker left.

Do you consider Bitcoin to be a perpetual ponzi scheme?

I am not sure if it isn't.

Among other things, transactions are not cheap, as they were supposed to be. The chain supporters are trying to pivot the whole thing as "Store of Value" which it isn't supposed to be. It does not scale. There are better blockchains offering everything bitcoin does and more (Ethereum for one).

They all are, Bitcoin is just a little bigger so the players are typically companies and institutions instead of individuals.

How on earth do you short while simultaneously buying at a premium? This not how any of it works.

I also do not fundamentally understand their plan. According to the article they will short XRP, clone XRP, then somehow get people to switch from the now worthless XRP in to their coin which would somehow not be worthless, then they will give people that switch more coins while still keeping the value of their coin high. Sounds crazy expensive and crazy risky.

This is just like the time the USD was hostilely taken over by the GBP and I had to exchange all my dollars for pounds so they wouldn't be worthless. Unless I was a government employee, then I was SOL. Truly the money of the future.

USD taken over by GBP? I'm curious, and I don't know enough of the history. Could you provide some details, please?

He's being facetious.

I’m just glad I got out of USD early to get a good exchange rate on all these Good Boy Points.

Well, the idea Valor is proposing here doesn't sound much more likely to work than your scenario.

Levels and levels of plotting.

What happens if the takeover fails? Well. Valor has the XRP of those dumb enough to exchange their XRP for the Valor tokens. Valor tokens are worthless and then Valor can just sell the XRP for profit.

Unless they spend too much in shorting they stand to profit from those who believe their takeover will succeed.

Could this title be less clickbaity? By including hints like "Ripple" and "Valor", for example.

Ok, we've edited the title to try to do that. Though the grammar is not the most un-awkward.

Thanks, although the attempted takeover is of XRP (the digital asset), not Ripple (the company).

Ok, edited that too.

Also the idea of the attack in the article sounds stupid. Don't know why this is getting the upvotes.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com