Since the referendum new facts have come to light, that of what an exit deal would look like. New facts should allow for a new vote.
If remain had won, there would be no new facts so why would another vote be justified?
2. This is not about FUD. This was egregious lies:
a) Daniel Hannan: “Absolutely nobody is talking about threatening our place in the single market.”
b) David Davies: "There will be no downside to Brexit, only a considerable upside."
c) Michael Gove: "The day after we vote to leave we hold all the cards and we can choose the path we want."
d) Boris Johnson: "There will continue to be free trade, and access to the single market."
Never mind the £ 350m for the NHS per week on the bus.
I could go on and on and on...
It is forced to deal with reality, which is that what Brexiteers promised was always undeliverable.
We could well be on path for a third general election in six years, a periodic vote to re-evaluate what we want as a country based on the current state of affairs.
Isn't being able to change your mind based on a changed context fundamental underpinning of a democratic system?