Comment by tptacek | Hacker News Reader

Comment by tptacek | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

Yes:

* Google Mail is, for most people, the safest email service, with the most mature and comprehensive 2FA, direct connectivity to GDocs to make viewing attachments safer, and a gigantic security team. Note too: this guide also suggests avoiding email as much as possible.

* If you work with sensitive documents (this checklist was originally devised for journalists and the airport lawyers), all the cloud drive services (not just Google Drive) are a bad idea.

* Chrome is the safest browser with the most mature and reliable anti-exploitation hardening and the most responsive security team.

* iOS devices are, for most people, far more secure than computers, which aren't locked down at all and for which any kind of local code execution is almost invariably game-over all the way through the kernel, and at least game over for all of the user's data. Most computer users are never more than an errant couple of clicks away from losing their whole machine to an attacker, which is not the case for someone reading their mail on an iPad.

I feel like there is conflicting information still.

> Google Mail is, for most people, the safest email service, with the most mature and comprehensive 2FA, direct connectivity to GDocs to make viewing attachments safer

> If you work with sensitive documents (this checklist was originally devised for journalists and the airport lawyers), all the cloud drive services (not just Google Drive) are a bad idea.

So is Google Drive a good idea or a bad idea? Maybe for normal people Gmail is good, but in the next point you say this list is for journalists and airport lawyers, wouldn't you advice them to use something more secure like fastmail/proton mail, or if you are serious, your own mail server or something? Why does this list not talk about TOR / PGP, the most fundamental tools for security for journalists?

> Chrome is the safest browser with the most mature and reliable anti-exploitation hardening and the most responsive security team.

I don't think this is true at all. What is wrong with Chromium or Firefox open source alternatives? Why doesn't it mention things like no-script and ublock origin?

> iOS devices are, for most people, far more secure than computers, which aren't locked down at all and for which any kind of local code execution is almost invariably game-over all the way through the kernel, and at least game over for all of the user's data. Most computer users are never more than an errant couple of clicks away from losing their whole machine to an attacker, which is not the case for someone reading their mail on an iPad.

My fundamental problem with this is that if you are going to be doing things on an iPad you are almost certainly going to be using cloud services. Weather it is Google Docs or Pages or Word or anything, it is very difficult to keep things 'local' to your hard drive on a iPad, where on a computer with dropbox it is much more clear that files in there are going to leave your computer.

First, no, I would never advise that anyone use ProtonMail, and if your primary objective is to gain security, I wouldn't recommend FastMail. The comment you're replying to provides the reasoning for that.

For most people, including technically inclined people, running your own mail server will almost certainly lose you significant amounts of security.

If you deal with sensitive documents like legal artifacts in immigration cases, you want to have control over which of your documents wind up in the cloud and which you retain custody over. So while viewing attachments in the cloud is very good practice (viewing them locally is a good way to get owned), running a service that generally slurps your local drive (or big chunks of it) into the cloud is not a good idea.

If you want to run a Chromium build rather than Chrome, that's fine.

I provided the reasoning for preferring iOS devices to general purpose computers already. The additional concern you just added doesn't come close to offsetting.

I'll add, though this isn't in the Tech Solidarity checklist, that if the goal is commercially reasonable security and not security in the public interest, Chromebooks are another good option for end-user computing.

So if I follow all this advice, how am I supposed to receive or send sensitive documents?

> If you deal with sensitive documents like legal artifacts in immigration cases, you want to have control over which of your documents wind up in the cloud and which you retain custody over.

This is incredibly easy with Dropbox or Google Drive. Everyone I know who uses these services has an intuitive knowledge for 'stuff in this folder goes in the cloud', and if they wanted to keep sensitive data off it they would know exactly how.

I am on an iPad, so no mature options for encrypting it myself with pgp or something really exist. I shouldn't upload it to a cloud service (although chances are that it already is, because pretty much every iOS app uses a cloud of some sort). I shouldn't email it. I can't plug in a physical usb device because iOS doesn't have File reading access to. I guess I convince everyone to use Signal? That is pretty impractical for 'normal' people to convert everyone over to their own messaging app.

Also, on your phone, what browser do you use? Chrome? Well, not really because it is all webkit under the hood, so you are going to be using Safari no matter what.

That's correct, we're not suggesting people use Chrome on their iOS device (but is a good question and a super common bit of feedback we got doing training for this stuff with end-users, who assumed that's what we meant). The subtext for the Chrome recommendation is "that's the browser you use on your general-purpose computer". WebKit on iOS benefits (imperfectly, but vs. a general-purpose machine it's probably a wash) from iOS's built-in application sandboxing and security controls.

Regarding sharing of sensitive documents: if you have to do it over the Internet, use a secure messenger to do it. Email attachments are probably the second most dangerous attack vector facing end-users (after phishing). That's why we tell people to use Google Mail; attachments open in their browser viewer and are rendered Google-serverside.

You don't need to convince everyone to use Signal; it's adequate to use WhatsApp, which, again, is already one of the most popular messaging applications in the world (this is one of the reasons getting Signal Protocol baked into WhatsApp was such a monumental achievement).

Reply on news.ycombinator.com