Millions of College Students Are Going Hungry
theatlantic.com
theatlantic.com
Even most people with professional jobs would consider it too expensive to eat out for breakfast, lunch, and dinner everyday, but we put many college students in a position where that’s basically their only option. At my school, campus dining plans were mandatory for your first year, and I didn’t have access to a real kitchen.
At the same time, it’s difficult for schools to control dining hall costs, because (at least anecdotally) “dining hall food quality” is a surprisingly big factor when high schoolers choose a college.
This is one symptom of a broader phenomenon: college has become a bundled product of courses and a degree + a package of expensive consumption choices, and it’s difficult to get one without the other. Most people early in their careers don’t live in luxury apartments, belong to fancy gyms, or eat out a lot, but living that lifestyle is the default expectation now if you go to a residential college or university in the US.
Why are there no shared kitchens? Most dorm-like university buildings i have seen in my country have shared kitchens for a couple of rooms or an entire floor.
US college students are adults right? Why would they not have any acces to a kitchen because of a possible fire hazard.
In terms of 'bad actors' ruining a kitchen, that seems more like a social problem more then anything else. Breaking a kitchen also seems like a senseless idea, especially in a community of people you live with.
Re: bad actors, it isn't just destructive tendencies. It's mostly just being a mess and not doing dishes/ not cleaning up after you're done.
My parents made me shop with them, cook with them, clean with them, no reason by age 17 or 18 one wouldn’t be able to handle that themselves. They should have had 8 years of practice already.
There are so many ways to cheaply feed yourself, even without a kitchen, that it seems like a self induced problem. If you can't afford the cafeteria food and you have no kitchen...how is the only other option just to starve???
I find an increasingly strong case to be made for going the community-college-then-transfer route since it brings together a bunch of points that affect most students in some fashion:
* Cost(obviously)
* Transitioning to independent life(less pressure to be a study machine rushing through the degree)
* Indecisiveness about career and motivations(easier, less stressful classes)
Going to a "tough" or "prestigious" school allows you to tell a certain story about yourself, but it usually doesn't lead to well-roundedness, which sets the stage for that common story of a high-achieving student who gets on the perfect parent-approved career track and then abandons it - whether in the middle of the degree, shortly after the first job, or after a few years of work - due to burnout.
Maybe students should learn to live independently before starting full time academic programs, but there is also an opportunity cost to delaying entry to their professional fields.
It seems like a problem, so is it a bad thing to solve it once we've (according to you) solved hunger and malnutrition?