If so, it almost certainly has a not-before time, and overflowing back to January 1st, 1970 will be before that not-before time. And so any behavior relying on that IoT device connecting to a service will fail.
If so, it almost certainly has a not-before time, and overflowing back to January 1st, 1970 will be before that not-before time. And so any behavior relying on that IoT device connecting to a service will fail.
Recently I brought up an emulated PPC running Mac OS 9. The included copy of Microsoft Internet Explorer couldn't connect to any site that used https -- and virtually everybody uses https these days.
https://quickview.cloudapps.cisco.com/quickview/bug/CSCsc455...
I see now there are other novel ways of supporting preemption for emergency vehicles, although I’m still unconvinced that’s what our city uses as the lights often preempt several minutes in advance and from over a kilometre away.
-- fire/ems provider.
I'm assuming it's illegal to use one obviously, but I wonder what precautions are used to prevent unauthorized usage, if that can even be disclosed to the public. What's stopping the average joe from getting one from Alibaba?
There is an encoding standard for prioritization that some larger systems use, that mass transit may utilize, but can be overrode by Fire/EMS/LE.
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/3dkk8k/how-las-tr...
Fictional or not, cities are hyped up on 'smart infrastructure', sorry to deliver the bad news.
Realtime map someone made with that: http://jouni.kapsi.fi/trevalot/