Not released AMD CPU performs a bit worse than already released Intel CPU. They are still behind. But it's very intriguing. If they managed to push 5+ GHz, it would be awesome CPU.
Price/Perf goes to AMD every time, and increasingly often; some parallel workloads can simply perform better on AMD CPUs.
I work on The Division 2 (My managing director was on stage during the keynote) and we get better performance in quite a lot of area's using AMD CPUs.
Interesting fact: AMD EPYCs in our DC run with less power consumption per compute than our Xeon Skylake servers. What I later learned was that Intel takes the average power consumption and lists it, where AMD lists the max. Not sure why that is.