EDIT: I should add that both the HDD Macs I owned (a 2009 Macbook Pro and a 2004 or 03 Macbook) had accelerometers and I found a cool app for oldest that made a lightsaber noise. This was pre smartphones, so it was novel. My Late 2013 Macbook Pro does not seem to have one.
But as long as it's only for actively open apps and web pages I don't really see much harm.
That's how I spend 10-ish% of my time on Hacker News
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=421691
Browsers have added rate limiting to mitigate this threat. (Prior to that, my former team in Google Ads added our own rate limiting to the gyroscope API we provided for ads.) The risk now seems pretty minor, but I wouldn't be shocked if someone clever still managed to find some way to abuse it.
Whaaaa?
Know what you are typing: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21128255-200-smartpho...
You can also determine things like health and other physical characteristics, similar to gait detection.
If you do have some source of absolute orientation, like a compass, surely you just use that and don't need the gyro.
I just took a quick look at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Detecting_d..., and it seems to provide orientation, and not angular velocities. So it could also be that browser implementations fuse magnetometer and inertial sensors to produce the orientation estimate. Is there another gyro API?
In fact, I didn't realize that the gyro worked in both dimensions! I thought it was just a fast downward fall and it was actually hard to hit the red block since it kept moving. Then I found out you could lay the phone flat and slow the green block down and it was way more fun!
I like the concept and could see a more complete game making a ton of sense.
I think it needs some sort of prompt about the tilting. Also the mechanism might need some calibration, I tested it with my SO and the tilting was too sensitive for her to control it accurately.
This is awosome on mobile!
And asking people to comment on the issue to say that they shouldn't be removed would not be helping the discussion, because that point has already been made in the thread by at least three people that I count.