As they should be. Why is this worth mentioning?
As they should be. Why is this worth mentioning?
The actual size was different from region to region, because there was no agreement on whether it is 1/10 or 1/12 of a feet, and 1 foot itself would correspond to different lengths: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obsolete_German_units_of_measu...
Eaxmples:
- 3.5 in floppy disks have no 3.5 dimension (the disk is 86 mm, the cartridge is 94x90 mm, the drive is 100 mm). - 3.5 in hard drives have neither 3.5 in platters nor are any of their external dimensions 3.5 in - Ditto for 2.5 in drives, likely also true for 5.5 and 8 in drives. - Any kind of inch-sensor size (e.g. 1/2, 2/3) is not the size of the sensor measured in any way. - ...
Apparently 8" disks are 8"/203mm wide, no doubt for exactly the same reason, and with a rather similar result.
It's like when flat screen TVs came out. When they first appeared in Europe, they sold in inch sizes. You'd go to a store in France and buy a 50 inch TV. Years later they started labeling things as "87.3cm" - and only much later started making sizes in even metric units - which are still uncommon to this day.
If you were reading a spec doc for the US 50" TV, and it was in metric, it absolutely is not something that "should be" - and is a very notable change. Just a friendly question - are you one of the scientists that worked on that mars probe that crashed?
Do read the specs someone else linked in this thread. All major dimensions are even metric measurements and thus are not even imperial measurements.