Chicago’s Deep Tunnel: The solution to urban flooding, or a cautionary tale?
slate.com
slate.com
Except that Chicago's publicly stated position is that the Deep Tunnel system is not the solution. This is not a new thing, either. It's been that way for more than 2 decades.
For more than 10 years, they've had a stormwater management building ordinance and (with few exceptions) any project (new construction or renovation) that changes the amount of stormwater exiting a piece of property is subject to it. It limits the flow rate of stormwater leaving, the volume of stormwater leaving, and the amount of sediment that can leave a piece of property. It is entirely math-based, with published formulas and coefficients and makes determining compliance straightforward, objective and fast.
They've received international recognition for their incremental approach to stormwater management, which recognizes that the vast majority of property in the city is private property built long ago. As for public property, whenever the city rebuilds an alleyway, it is done with permeable pavement and is disconnected from the sewer. Whenever the city rebuilds a road, it is disconnected from the sewer to the extent that surrounding private property allows. Last year an entire block of a road near me was rebuilt and the side that was adjacent to a railroad embankment was built with swales every 50 feet or so to manage stormwater. It was actually visually attractive as well.
https://www.citizensenergygroup.com/Our-Company/Our-Projects...
http://www.minneapolismn.gov/publicworks/stormwater/cso/cso_...
https://metrocouncil.org/News-Events/Wastewater-Water/Newsle...
The specific project I linked to involved installing over 25 miles of storm drain to avoid combined sewer/storm overflows into the ocean. We lived on one of the impacted streets.
Older houses had gutter downspouts that dumped all rainwater into the combined storm drain/sewer system. The MWRA came to neighborhood association meetings, and helped residents to re-aim downspouts onto green space.
Cities close to water used to be a necessity. Now such locations are a liability. It's difficult to imagine politicians and local leaders coming clean on such things.
Side note: I wonder if Amazon factored such things into its decision(s) for picking its new HQ city(s).
Aside from the arc of the idea, be sure to note that Chicago is built in a swamp; and that more and more rain is more than the tunnel system can bear.
Your statement might be true. However, it's not so much so for Chicago (which is obvious when reading the article).
Sprawl is not unsustainable. More costly, yes. But people will pay to not live densely and should have the freedom to do so if urban development and building techniques that prioritize mitigating environmental harm are practiced.
But the stormwater problems are because of Chicago sprawling out.
No, the problem is that the drains from all that paved/overbuilt land end up in the sewers instead of being collected in rainwater tanks or sunk into the ground below the foundation.
The growth might not be in Chicago proper, but the well-being of Chicago proper - drives growth in the area.