London is the only city in Europe that even comes close to offering what NYC alone does in terms of public transit.
Even Berlin, the second largest city in the EU, has pitiful public transit in comparison.
London is the only city in Europe that even comes close to offering what NYC alone does in terms of public transit.
Even Berlin, the second largest city in the EU, has pitiful public transit in comparison.
I would really like to know what makes you think Berlin public transit is "pitiful"...
The U-Bahn / S-Bahn / Deutsche Bahn / Autobus / Tram inter-connectivity are at least on par with what NYC has to offer (adjusted for geographic factors and population density), and that's before getting into KPIs like on-time arrival percentages, individual line uptime, and peak hour commuter congestion. And then there's the more intangible differences, which are nevertheless important to humans - like vehicle cleanliness, station upkeep... the list goes on and on.
Compare the Berlin Hauptbahnhof to Penn Station. Or the U1 to the L, or the J/M/Z. Or peak-hour Alexanderplatz to Union Square. Or the M29 to... I don't know... the NYC bus of your choosing. My god. Throw whatever numbers you want out there as a counterargument, but I know which I'd prefer in just about any scenario.
http://www.muenchen-touristeninformation.de/MVV-Schnellbahnn...
http://www.hungarybudapestguide.com/wp-content/uploads/detai...
I have. As of 2010 (before Cuomo's tenure began), New York had unambiguously better public transit overall than Paris, in addition to serving a city with four times the population of Paris.
Cuomo is doing his best to "fix" that, but in 2018, I'd still take NYC over Paris as far as public transit is concerned.