Ways the world improved in 2018
qz.com
qz.com
Is anybody reading these plots? This is really the worst news I read this year.
A significant amount of work and investment goes into making some of these plots trend that way:
https://datareport.goalkeepers.org/
You might be down-voted because you take that improvement for granted.
This is great news! In about 75 years, we'll use >90% renewable energy. (1.42^(x/12) = 0.9/0.1)
Which of these is the better model? I don't know, I can't eyeball statistical regression on this chart. But my gut says percentage of energy use growth isn't what we should pay attention to if we want to predict the long run future. When/if renewables become far cheaper than coal, that percentage is going to skyrocket fast.
It's a nice article but as so often, a misleading title and suggestive charting choices. Hopefully fixing that will be in the 2019 article.
But <10% on the GOP side.
The short answer is: there is still a significant part of the electorate which prefers to have male representatives, and various networks and institutional structures in some parties which give men an advantage.
it is true if Congress would be engaged in sex related questions only
But if it were true it would suggest that there are some important questions going unaddressed the way things are right now.
Assuming you're naive, here's an example from today's paper: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/31/opinion/childbirth-injury...
More generally: why have more than one representative at all? Because every person has a slightly different perspective based on where they're from. The wider the variety of opinions (at least to the degree they reflect the diversity of opinions -- urban/agricultural/wilderness; male, female; different levels of education and background; etc) -- the more useful the result.
-- Jean-Paul Marat, 1743-1793