What Does History Smell Like?
daily.jstor.org
daily.jstor.org
Cities in these places, on the other hand, can have overwhelming scents. In addition to all the smoke from the same activities above, some of the large cities (particularly in Asia) have open sewers in the street, and standing bodies of water with algae overgrowth. I imagine this is roughly what large cities over the millenia have smelled like.
Now there are two major pollutants in the mix as well: cars (with no pollution standards in place) and industrial manufacturing. Of the places I've been, this is most prevalent in large cities in India and Thailand.
That didn't just cause people to be fussy about smells. It caused them, for hundreds of years, to ignore evidence for the actual mechanism of disease transmission. The well-known story about the Broad St cholera outbreak, where someone figured out (in 1854) that cholera was caused by tainted drinking water, didn't have a happy ending as the "miasma" (odors) theory prevailed with public health officials and millions more died.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1854_Broad_Street_cholera_outb...
I've spent some time thinking about historical smells. My money says a huge hunk of history smelled like the back end of a horse.
Farms probably didn’t smell as strongly of animal piss as they do now due to less confinement and smaller numbers of animals.
India has probably smelled like burning cow dung for millennia. It’s a very characteristic and welcoming smell (though probably horrible if you actually live in a dwelling where this technology is used)
"But Jenner writes that this kind of stink was by no means ubiquitous in premodern times. It was in moments of high poverty and rapid urbanization that the most awful odors arose—“moments and cultures better understood as experiencing or entering modernity than as immured in some ‘primitive’ state.”"